In the wake of the recent US measles outbreak, Public Health Seattle King County has published searchable data on student immunization levels covering all K-12 schools in the county. Data fields include vaccination completion rates at each specific school ( color-coded to show rate levels); MMR immunization among kindergarteners; and immunization coverage rates in general among kindergarten and 6th grade students. The sociodemographic correlations to vaccination rates reflect the national trends that have made headlines, are not a surprise to locals. Kudos to the PHSKC team for innovative use of technology in the public interest!
Archive for the ‘Responsible journalism’ Category
King County Reports on Immunization Levels for K-12 Schools
Posted in Children's Health, Consumer Protection, Ethics, immunizations, Responsible journalism on 9 February 2015| Leave a Comment »
Health News Review : News We Need Gets a Boost
Posted in Conflicts of Interest, Consumer Protection, Economics of Health Care, Ethics, Health Care Marketing, Lobbying, Paitent safety, Patient Safety, Promotions, Responsible journalism on 19 January 2015| Leave a Comment »
Exciting news came at the end of the year for Gary Schwitzer’s Health News Review project which had lost the funding that supported the team of reviewers that analyzed the accuracy of health stories in the news and published their findings. HNR was awarded a two-year, $1.3 million grant from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to continue and expand its work, which will now be housed in the new Center for Media Communication and Health in the U of Minnesota School of Public Health.
I’ll be looking forward to more important stories coming our way soon to share here. And all of us can hone our critical thinking skills on health news stories by applying the HNR framework anytime:
What’s the total cost?
How often do benefits occur?
How often do harms occur?
How strong is the evidence?
Is this condition exaggerated?
Are there alternative options?
Is this really a new approach?
Is it available to me?
Who’s promoting this?
Do they have a conflict of interest?
Poor Journalism Fans Flames of Hate in the Evergreen State
Posted in Advocacy, Discrimination, DSHS budget, Economics of Health Care, Ethics, Health Disparities, Health Insurance, Healthcare Inequalities, Language Access, Lobbying, Recession, Responsible journalism, State of Washington on 4 February 2011| Leave a Comment »
A front-page article published on February 1 by The Seattle Times, now the Emerald City’s sole remaining daily newspaper, purporting to describe new state demographic trends, is causing outrage at a very critical time. At this very moment the draconian cuts proposed by the Governor to balance the budget, are the subject of contention in the Legislature as advocates struggle to convince lawmakers to preserve at least the semblance of a safety net . The program cuts would disproportionately affect poor immigrants and refugees and communities of color, as the planned terminations cut deeply into a range of services from state food assistance, citizenship programs, Medicaid medical interpreter services, to health insurance plans which now cover noncitizen adults and some 27,000 children enrolled in the Children’s Health program of Apple Health for Kids, among other vital services. In addition, other bills being considered would promote racial/ethnic profiling of state residents, including requiring citizenship checks of applicants for drivers’ licenses to those targeting youth for incarceration on the basis of presumed but not proven gang affiliations.
So it seems like more than a coincidence that the Times story Illegal-immigrant numbers in state jump 35% in 3 years was published the day before the Senate Ways & Means Committee was to hold a hearing on the 2011 Supplemental Budget bill which encompasses all of the cuts. The Times article discussed a just-released report from the Pew Hispanic Center entitled Unauthorized Immigrant Population:
National and State Trends, 2010, about results of the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey. Beyond just the damage that the inflammatory and dehumanizing language of the article’s title can cause in the court of public opinion , it turns out that reporter Lornet Turnbull got his facts wrong too. Subsequently Jeff Passel, one of the authors of the Pew report, was interviewed by a reporter for local radio station. Passel said that based on the Census data, there was no evidence that Washington’s undocumented population had increased, pointing to the high margin of error in the data analysis and its very small sample size, and more pointedly, that the Seattle Times had not done fact-checking with Pew. The Feb. 3 interview Dispute About Growth Of Undocumented Immigrants In Wash. can be heard in its entirety on the KUOW website.
In these desperate economic times, articles like this one in the Seattle Times serve only to scapegoat all immigrants for the economic woes of the state (and the nation) instead of focusing on the genuine causes of the recession. Over 400 comments have been posted in response so far, most of them of a hate-mongering nature. Recognition that Washington’s regressive tax structure means that all of us contribute at the same (sales tax) rate to state coffers, regardless of immigration status or income, is handily overlooked by the ranters. Interestingly, the Times has posted a partial correction to the article, explaining that undocumented people constitute a small fraction of the state’s population
A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that illegal immigrants accounted for nearly 5 percent of the state’s population, giving Washington the seventh highest rate of illegal immigrants in the nation. A Pew Hispanic Center report, on which the story was based, incorrectly attributed the percentage and ranking to Washington state rather than to the District of Columbia. The center has corrected the information in its online report to reflect that illegal immigrants comprise 3.4 percent of Washington state’s population, a rate that does not rank it among the top 10 states.
The story’s problematc title and other content inaccuracies however remain the same, its damage done. Use of attention-grabbing headlines is a journalistic technique of course; likewise fewer readers ever bother to go back to read corrections.
Categories
- Access to Medicines
- Advocacy
- AMA
- Assistance
- Cancer
- Cause Marketing
- Children's Health
- Community clinics
- Conflicts of Interest
- Consumer Protection
- Cord Blood
- Discrimination
- DSHS budget
- Economics of Health Care
- End of Life
- Environmental Health
- Ethics
- FDA
- Generics
- Glivec
- Global Health
- Health Care Marketing
- Health Care Reform
- Health Disparities
- Health Insurance
- Health Literacy
- Healthcare Inequalities
- Hispanic/Latino
- Immigrants
- immunizations
- Language Access
- Language Services
- Leukemia
- Limited English Proficiency
- Lobbying
- Medicaid
- Military medicine
- National Marrow Donor Program
- Nutrition
- Paitent safety
- Patient groups
- Patient Safety
- Pharmacists
- Prescription drugs
- Promotions
- Recession
- Responsible journalism
- State of Washington
- Tobacco control
- Translation
- Workers' rights
Pages
Archives
- February 2017
- January 2017
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- December 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Blog Stats
- 35,773 hits
Meta